CPA

Donate Now through the Tides Center, A Network for Good



Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for updates about the GreenScreen program and activities.


Welcome to the GreenScreen™ for Safer Chemicals v 1.2

We would like to thank the GreenScreen™ Technical Advisory Committee and the GreenScreen™ Steering Committee for all of their helpful feedback and input in helping us realize our goal of continual improvement and development of a robust, scientifically based method that is practical and protective of human health and the environment.

At this site you may download all of the supporting resources and documentation for performing a GreenScreen™ assessment using GreenScreen™ v 1.2. We have also provided example assessments.

GreenScreen™ v1.2 Training Workshop

Clean Production Action is hosting six separate one-day experiential training workshops on the GreenScreen™ for Safer Chemicals in the Great Lakes Region from 2012 - 2014. Click here for more information.

GreenScreen™ v 1.2 (2e) Hazard Criteria

There are 18 hazard endpoints addressed by GreenScreen Hazard Criteria:

Click here to download the GreenScreen™ hazard criteria (.pdf, 124KB) (November 2012)

Environmental Fate Environmental Health* Human Health Group I Human Health Group II Physical Hazards
Persistence (P) Acute Aquatic Toxicity (AA) Carcinogenicity (C) Acute Mammalian Toxicity (AT) Reactivity (Rx)
Bioaccumulation (B) Chronic Aquatic Toxicity(CA) Mutagenicity & Genotoxicity (M) Systemic Toxicity & Organ Effects (incl. Immunotoxicity) (ST) Flammability (F)
    Reproductive Toxicity (R) Neurotoxicity (N)  
    Developmental Toxicity (incl. Developmental Neurotoxicity) (D) Sensitization (SnS)
     
        Endocrine Activity (E) Respiratory Sensitization (SnR)  
          Skin Irritation (IrS)  
      *Other Ecotoxicity Studies when available   Eye Irritation (IrE)  

    GreenScreen™ v 1.2 Benchmarks

    GreenScreen™ v 1.2 includes four Benchmarks. Each Benchmark includes a set of criteria that a chemical, along with its known and predicted transformation products, must pass. To progress from Benchmark 1 to Benchmark 2, a chemical (including transformation products) must pass all the criteria specified under Benchmark 1. Likewise, to advance from Benchmark 2 to Benchmark 3, the chemical (and its transformation products) must pass all of the criteria in Benchmark 2, etc.

    Click here for the GreenScreen™ v 1.2 Benchmarks. (.pdf, 241KB) (October 2011)

    ToxServices has released the GreenScreen™ Inspector to help calculate a GreenScreen™ Benchmark score. Click here to try the GreenScreen Inspector

    GreenScreen™ Assessment Template

    Download the GreenScreen™ v 1.2 Assessment Template in Word™ format to ensure that your assessments are comprehensive and consistent. 

    Click here for the GreenScreen™ v 1.2 Assessment Template (.docx, 194KB) (February 2012)

    GreenScreen™ List Translator (February 2012)

    Performing an initial screen of authoritative and screening hazard lists can be a big time saver when it comes to assessing chemicals.  It can rule out chemicals of concern and help to identify those chemicals that are best suited for a full GreenScreen™ assessment. The GreenScreen™  List Translator includes:

    • Definitions of Authoritative, Screening A and B Lists
    • GreenScreen™ Specified Lists
    • Hazard Lists Identifying Benchmark 1 Chemicals
    • Hazard Lists Identifying Possible Benchmark 1 Chemicals

    Click here to download the GreenScreen™ List Translator for Benchmark 1 ("Red List") and Possible Benchmark 1 Chemicals (.pdf, 56KB) (February 2012)

    GreenScreen™ Guidance (DRAFT)

    Please download the DRAFT GreenScreen™ Guidance for best practices in dealing with hazard classification, data gaps, identifying feasible and relevant transformation products, reporting on mixtures and more.

    Click here for the DRAFT GreenScreen v 1.2 Guidance (.pdf, 147KB)

    Additional GreenScreen™ Information Sources

    Click here for the GreenScreen™ v 1.2 Information Sources (.pdf, 12KB) (October 2011)

    Example GreenScreen™ Assessments

    It is helpful to see what a full GreenScreen™ assessment looks like.

    The Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse (IC2) is launching a Chemical Hazard Assessment Database to make available assessments based on the GreenScreen™ for Safer Chemicals and the Quick Chemical Assessment Tool, a simplified version of the GreenScreen developed by Washington Department of Ecology. The database will continue to grow as more chemical hazard assessments become available. Visit the IC2 Chemical Hazard Assessment Database.

    The following chemical hazard assessments were performed by Licensed GreenScreen Profilers and provide examples of how GreenScreen can be applied to both organic and inorganic chemicals:

    Click here for the example GreenScreen™ v 1.2 assessment of 104-76-7 2-Ethyl-1-Hexanol (.pdf, 586KB) 

    Click here for  the example GreenScreen™ v 1.2 assessment of 1332-07-6 Zinc Borate (.pdf, 327KB) 

    GreenScreen™ Technical Advisory Committee

    Meredith Haamen
    Arcadis, Business
    Su Patel
    California Department of Toxic Substance Control (DTSC), Government
    Sara Hoover, Bruce Winder
    California Office of Environmental Health and Hazard Assessment, Government
    Sharyle Patton
    Commonweal, NGO
    Ann Blake
    Environmental & Public Health Consulting, Consultant
    Shari Franjevic
    Transform to Green, representing Clean Production Action, Consultant
    Cal Baier-Anderson, now with DfE
    Environmental Defense Fund, NGO
    Maya Berci, Manon Drake
    Environment Canada, Government
    James Ewell
    GreenBlue, NGO
    Tom Lent
    Healthy Building Network, NGO
    Helen Holder, Paul Mazurkiewicz, Cory Robertson, Curtis Wray
    Hewlett-Packard, Business
    Art Fong
    IBM, Business
    Jay Bolus
    McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry (MBDC), Business
    Andy Chen, John Frazier
    Nike, Business
    Pam Eliasen
    Lowell Center for Sustainable Production (LCSP), NGO
    Eric Harrington, Teresa McGrath, Nancy Linde
    NSF International, NGO
    Lauren Heine, consulting Co-Director
    Clean Production Action, NGO
    Ken Soltys
    Pure Strategies, Business
    Dennis McGavis
    Shaw Industries, Business
    Dele Ogunseitan
    University of California - Urvine, Academia
    Julie Schoenung
    University of California - Davis, Academia
    Cal Baier-Anderson, Libby Sommer
    US Environmental Protection Agency, Design for the Environment, Government
    Alex Stone
    Washington State Department of Ecology, Government
    Margaret Whittaker
    ToxServices, Business


    Last updated December 2011

    GreenScreen™ Steering Committee

    Facilitated by Clean Production Action (NGO): Lauren Heine, Mark Rossi, Shari Franjevic Members include:

    Joyce Taylor, Cory Robertson, Helen Holder, Curtis Wray
    Hewlett Packard, Business
    Liaison to Steering Committee:
    Libby Sommer, Cal Baier-Anderson
    US Environmental Protection Agency, Design for the Environment, Government
    Art Fong
    IBM, Business
    Troy Virgo
    Shaw Industries, Business
    Pam Eliasen, Ken Geiser, Monica Becker
    Lowell Center for Sustainable Production; University of Massachusetts Lowell; Toxics Use Reduction Institute, NGO, University
    Fredric Petit
    DSM, Business
    Jen Sass
    Natural Resources Defense Council, NGO
    Anna Lennquist, Jerker Lighart
    ChemSec, NGO
    Megan Schwarzman
    University of California Center for Occupational and Environmental Health; Berkeley Center for Green Chemistry, University
    Ben Bowers
    VF Corporation, Business